Pacifist chara
![pacifist chara pacifist chara](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/LmQrjwdey08/hqdefault.jpg)
Chara had no reason to believe Asriel was alive until then, speaking, breathing, and calling their name. They just found out their best friend was alive after dying with him. The text spacing doubles out, the line delivers extremely slowly. The narrator has a huge reaction upon hearing his voice - the biggest emotional reaction they’ve had so far. There is a jarring moment in the Pacifist run where the narrator completely breaks their usual way of narrating. Frisk does not yet know what happened in this bed. Mind you, this is still the pacifist run and white-text.ĭespite not knowing everything, they know what happened here. They react to this bed only, and pass this rather morbid, off-handed remark here. This narrator knows something about this bed that makes it different from the bed on the right. So we return to this neutral/pacifist line: The narrator doesn’t know everything and can learn or be proven wrong. They also think Shyren’s tone deaf until Frisk starts singing with her… …and they seem a little dismayed to find there was something worth the repeated checks after all. In addition narrator’s inconsistent botany knowledge, when you check the snow poffs in Snowdin, the narrator also shows a reaction to something they didn’t know before (after indulging in some serious sarcasm at Frisk’s incessant checking) No one had to teach the narrator what this rare species of flower was name, even though they didn’t know what the common water sausage was called. They seem excited, too.Īnd they may not have known what a water sausage was called, but they knew what a golden flower looked like when they saw it at the very start, before anyone has even mentioned them or pointed them out. There is no reason the narrator should fail to know something so obvious this soon in the game. It’s another line that seems out of place the first time you see it - shouldn’t the narrator know everything? You’ve taught the narrator? Narrators, as you know, are supposed to be informative and helpful. They only seem to know what Frisk knows, and what they know.Īt first, they don’t know what the plant in Toriel’s hallway is any more than Frisk does. Most importantly, the narrator only had this reaction to Chara’s bed. That sort of comment, especially in the pacifist run, is probably enough to make you squint and go “the fuck, my dude”.
![pacifist chara pacifist chara](https://d.wattpad.com/story_parts/137/images/14c2329cec6ddb58464306156264.jpg)
That’s a pretty morbid comment to make “If you laid down here you might not get up”. What’s so special about the left one? Why is it this one that prompts this reaction? There it’s just described as a “twin-sized” bed.īut the narrator has a reaction upon seeing the bed on the left in the Pacifist route. Nothing seems off about this in the pacifist run. Here, we see the Chara describe the bed on the right as Asriel’s bed. It has most of the information known so far that supports the theory, and then some. It’s finally done!Īs a good portion (though not all) of this post is based on the well-known “Chara is the narrator” theory, first and foremost, this section has to be here to provide the base of the post. If you liked the animation, and like Chara (or don’t like Chara) then please consider reading the meta. The result is what could conceivably be called thorough.Ĭompared to the animation I made as the header, the post’s content was much harder to put together and write I consider the animation icing on the cake. Uh, so I’ve been working on this meta post for around 3 months now, gathering screenshots, gathering feedback, gathering more screenshots.